Modelling cluster profiles …

I spent last week in Paris visiting the Institut Pasteur for a Gates Foundation workshop organised to focus thinking around the problem of designing a Target Product Profile for a ‘commercial’ malaria serology test.  On my journey back I read a recent arXival by Olamaie et al. on the topic of cluster modelling with electron pressure profiles.  This one caught my eye because the authors describe the use of Bayesian model selection to determine the number of knots (in a simple interpolating function for the radial profile shape) necessary to support the complexity of the available data.  In this case it is imagined that the positions of the knots and the amplitude of the cluster profile at each knot location are free parameters and that the cluster profile is linearly interpolated between knots. While this produces a model with discontinuous gradient I actually don’t mind that aspect since these types of models tend to nevertheless produce smooth posterior aggregates (e.g. posterior median curves; see, e.g., the voronoi tesselation GP model of Kim et al.).

Where I see some issues with the method is in the choice of priors for the knot amplitudes which are uniform and independent of knot position or ordering. An ordering is discussed for the radial location of each knot but as far as I can see this doesn’t affect the prior on each knot’s amplitude, and indeed is there simply to avoid an identifiability ‘problem’ (similar to the labelling in mixture models; i.e., this is only a ‘problem’ for some computational methods of marginal likelihood estimation rather than being an inherent flaw in the Bayesian construction).  My concern is that the use of these vague uniform priors is inconsistent with our expectations of a broadly decreasing profile; applying these priors to real data will ultimately skew the posterior in model space towards small numbers of knots where signal-to-noise is low.  In particular, I would suggest that this construction will produce an overly simplified representation of profiles in both the cluster core and cluster outskirts. To play “Devil’s Advocate” (& based on my experience with Sersic profile fitting) I would suggest that the ordinary parametric forms may well perform better in this type of application—or at least there are no examples in the manuscript to even attempt to convince me the other way.

If I were conducting the analysis I would be interested in models taking some prior information from the available theoretical parametric forms; for example, to build a model from GP deviations about a canonical profile. If such a model was not considered fast enough to fit generally then perhaps at least to use such a model to learn some more refined priors on the knot construction.

18882183_10101007908475502_7904980857851044873_n.jpg

Incidentally: [removed]

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Modelling cluster profiles …

  1. I’m sure the stories I’ve heard are very likely to be true but if presented to an university authority would be (if found proved) in themselves not sufficient to cause the offenders to suffer a serious reprimand, whereas the personal cost to the complainant might be rather large. However, there seems to be some value to publicising a small level of very general information. For instance, if someone who has a larger grievance about a specific person would want to track down supporting information then I would consider to pass on the details of what I heard and who from. I wouldn’t propose to present hearsay to any kind of university authority of course, rather I would acknowledge that each statement must be given by the person who witnessed it.

    This seems like the right thing to do in a Bayesian ethical sense: to transit enough information that someone who’s suffered at the hands of these people can achieve some shrinkage on their posterior at a minimal cost to the prior on bad behaviour from any given member of what is still a large community. If by mentioning bad behaviour then some specific person springs to mind that might say more about that person than the state of gossip in our field.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s